Re: CO2 Funny

On 25/05/2024 6:20 am, john larkin wrote:

On Fri, 24 May 2024 19:49:13 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
 

On Fri, 24 May 2024 10:42:36 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:43:42 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

On Fri, 24 May 2024 07:17:55 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:29:37 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 23 May 2024 07:08:05 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 23 May 2024 09:33:11 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 10:52:40 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:10:58 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:54:30 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby
<news@spockmail.net> wrote:
>

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
>
<snip>
>

Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel
the need to show everyone here how clever I am.

>
Spoken like a true liberal.
>
When things don't go your way... start name calling.

>
Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap.

>
Indeed.
>
9djf3jlovr2bmpkn03e18237njtcorg9rj@4ax.com

>
>
That was, in my opinion, a reasonable observation. Nasty humorless
people DO usually design nasty electronics. Or no electronics.

>
Your hypocrisy is breathtaking!
>
You started this off topic thread in which you posed a question
completely unrelated to the subject. I answered your question
honestly but your narcissism prompted you to take it as an insult
presumably because I hadn't massaged your ego. You leapt in feet first
with your stock insult and when I retaliated you and your fan club
rounded on me for having the audacity to call out one of the worst
offenders for insults.
>
If you want to see SED cleaned up you should take a leaf out of your
own book and stop indulging in off topic rubbish.

>
Like active filters?

>
Do try not to be so stupid. As you well know I was referring to the
subject of the current thread being off-topic.
>
Of course active filters are a suitable topic for discussion in SED,
but when you include a stupid question in your own off topic thread
you should not throw around insults when you get an answer you don't
expect. Were you hoping for a "yes please" type of response?

>
Obviously. But nobody is interested.
>
Are you here to discuss electronics, or to cackle and insult? Lately
SED is full of clucking old hens who probably haven't owned an
oscilloscope in decades.

>
If ever.
>
Joe Gwinn

>
I got my first scope, a Heathkit, when I was in junior high school. It
was I think 5 MHz, all ac-coupled, repetitive sweep, uncalibrated,
pretty primitive.
>
I later got a summer job in a university physics  department and got
to use a Tektronix. I was amazed. That 535 cost as much as a Chevrolet
at the time.
>
>

So what? Who cares?

 What oscilloscopes do you have now?
 Maybe you don't care about scopes. It's amazing what you can get from
Amazon now. A nice 100 MHz color scope with probes starting at $99.

So what? It's what you use it to look at that counts.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney