Sujet : Re: CO2 Funny
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 25. May 2024, 08:34:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2s0ql$2p1no$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/05/2024 12:58 am, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2024 16:32:26 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 5/22/24 15:36, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:53:16 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 18:40:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard <pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:26:43 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 18:16:28 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard <pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 08:50:23 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 14:23:04 +0100, chrisq <devzero@nospam.com> wrote:
On 5/21/24 04:15, john larkin wrote:
<snip>
This IS an electronic design discussion group. It seems
counter-productive to discourage posting about circuits.
It isn't counter-productive to discourage posting about bad circuits, and while posts from people who don't actually know what their circuit is doing may generate useful discussion, they are of themselves helpful.
I note that the chronic insulters never post new circuits, or make
intelligent comments about the few that are posted. Actual electronic
design seems to annoy them; one wonders why.
John Larkin is careful not to post an actual name. If I'm one of his "chronic insulters", I have posted new circuits here, and made what I imagine to be intelligent comments about them and others.
The "micro power square wave oscillator" thread from July 2 2008 does come to mind.
I didn't post my version of a circuit that worked at 100kHz until the 7th July 2008 - I'd been house-sitting my brother's house in Australia when the thread started, which had limited what I could do - and I reworked John Field's circuit with a real inductor one could buy off the shelf, and got it to work too.
John Larkin hasn't done anything like that - or if he has I've repressed the memory pretty effectively.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney