Sujet : Re: An actual circuit
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 25. May 2024, 17:47:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <qs145jtgtk7a5g7jfg3ujcfqe3qnfjo3bf@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 25 May 2024 03:36:06 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Mike Monett VE3BTI <spamme@not.com> wrote:
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Insect cruelty. Plus you have to count their tiny feets backwards.
The only good bugs is dead bugs. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
The major flaw with dead bugs is you lose the identification of the ic.
>
Six months later, you will have no idea what the circuit is, where the
important signals are, or how the circuit works.
>
Nah. I build them inside the lid of a cast aluminum stomp box, and put a
paper schematic inside. No worries.
Where do you document the results?