Re: CO2 Funny

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: CO2 Funny
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 28. May 2024, 17:42:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v34u0t$lhm8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28/05/2024 3:01 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2024 14:22:28 -0400, Edward Rawde wrote:
 
I still don't see why it matters so much when the two of you are in
different countries and, correct me if I'm wrong,
you've never used or tested any of JL's products.
 I'll tell you exactly why Bill has a bug up his arse about John. Many,
many years ago, Bill went to John for a job. Bill is admittedly pretty
good at electronics, but he also has a *terrible* attitude problem and
prefers to spend as much time as possible thumbing through discredited
Marxist theory (like as if it's worth anyone's time to read that crap).
This is about as "exact" as the rest of Cursitor Doom's regular nonsense.
The people I've worked for and with don't seem to think that I've got an attitude problem, and the closest I've got reading "Marxist Theory" are books like "Capital in the 21st Century" and "the Spirit Level".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_in_the_Twenty-First_Century
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level_(book)
This is one more of Cursitor Doom's fatuous inventions.

Fortunately, John saw through Bill at the last moment and declined to hire
him. Bill's never forgiven John for that bullet-dodging decision.
On the contrary what John did to get up my nose was to copy my private e-mail - which wasn't applying for a job but responding to an open request by John on s.e.d. that had asked for sub-contract assistance - to Jim Thompson, who promptly posted a boast on s.e.d. that he'd saved John from making the terrible mistake of having anything to do with me.
I certainly wasn't going to more to California to take up a job with John, but I had done some remote consulting, and it had - sort of - worked.
Giving Jim Thompson anything to gloat about hadn't been part of the plan, and my already not-all-that-positive opinion of John became rather more negative.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 24 * CO2 Funny68john larkin
21 May 24 +* Re: CO2 Funny2Bill Sloman
21 May 24 i`- Re: CO2 Funny1John R Walliker
21 May 24 `* Re: CO2 Funny65chrisq
21 May 24  `* Re: CO2 Funny64john larkin
21 May 24   +* Re: CO2 Funny62john larkin
21 May 24   i+* Re: CO2 Funny60john larkin
22 May 24   ii+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   ii+* Re: CO2 Funny48jim whitby
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny2jim whitby
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny42john larkin
22 May 24   iiii+* Re: CO2 Funny40john larkin
23 May 24   iiiii+* Re: CO2 Funny17Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny16Edward Rawde
26 May 24   iiiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny14Bill Sloman
26 May 24   iiiiii i`* Re: CO2 Funny13Edward Rawde
26 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
27 May 24   iiiiii i i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Jeroen Belleman
27 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny7Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i i`* Re: CO2 Funny6john larkin
27 May 24   iiiiii i i `* Re: CO2 Funny5Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i i  `* Re: CO2 Funny4john larkin
28 May 24   iiiiii i i   `* Re: CO2 Funny3Bill Sloman
28 May 24   iiiiii i i    `* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
28 May 24   iiiiii i i     `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiiii i `* Re: CO2 Funny3Cursitor Doom
28 May 24   iiiiii i  `* Re: CO2 Funny2Bill Sloman
30 May 24   iiiiii i   `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
26 May 24   iiiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
23 May 24   iiiii+* Re: CO2 Funny16john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
24 May 24   iiiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny14john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny10Joe Gwinn
24 May 24   iiiiii i`* Re: CO2 Funny9john larkin
24 May 24   iiiiii i +* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii i i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii i `* Re: CO2 Funny6Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i  `* Re: CO2 Funny5john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii i   `* Re: CO2 Funny4Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i    `* Re: CO2 Funny3Mike Monett VE3BTI
25 May 24   iiiiii i     +- Re: CO2 Funny1Phil Hobbs
25 May 24   iiiiii i     `- Re: CO2 Funny1Jeroen Belleman
24 May 24   iiiiii +- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
25 May 24   iiiiii +- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   iiiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iiiii+- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
26 May 24   iiiii`* Re: CO2 Funny5Cursitor Doom
26 May 24   iiiii +* Re: CO2 Funny3john larkin
27 May 24   iiiii i+- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
27 May 24   iiiii i`- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
27 May 24   iiiii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   iii+* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
23 May 24   iiii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   iii`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   ii`* Re: CO2 Funny10Jeroen Belleman
22 May 24   ii `* Re: CO2 Funny9john larkin
22 May 24   ii  +* Re: CO2 Funny6john larkin
22 May 24   ii  i+- Re: CO2 Funny1john larkin
23 May 24   ii  i+* Re: CO2 Funny3chrisq
23 May 24   ii  ii`* Re: CO2 Funny2john larkin
23 May 24   ii  ii `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   ii  i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
23 May 24   ii  +- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
25 May 24   ii  `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   i`- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman
22 May 24   `- Re: CO2 Funny1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal