Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam!

On 29/05/2024 7:07 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:02:38 -0400, bitrex wrote:
 

I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in
conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some
paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to
reading the journals that contain them.
>
But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a
"highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its
popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand.
>
Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and
degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at
least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there
to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the
equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight
in the head and you got your PhD, easy.

 That's precisely the problem with you elitist types. You believe no one
should be allowed to express any political opinion unless they have a
degree from somewhere like Columbia or Brown.

The bar is set a bit lower. You merely have to know a bit about what you are talking about, which you can't manage.

Your sort  believe it's only permissible to espouse a view if it's couched in suitably nuanced terms -
which conveniently excludes anyone with populist, Right-wing sensibilities
who didn't have a privileged upbringing. So much for "inclusiveness" eh.

You have populist right-wing sensibilities, yet you use a low-frequency word like nuanced.
You are also addicted to fatuous right-wing nonsense to a degree that suggests that you are probably clinically insane, but not flamboyant with it, so you don't have to locked away to prevent you physically attacking other people. Subverting them with vicious fantasies, doesn't   - as yet - constitute a recognised crime against the community.
Trump may yet do enough damage to change that.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney