Re: Operating temperature derating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Operating temperature derating
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Jun 2024, 15:22:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3n4f4$e9uh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 6/3/2024 7:52 AM, Don Y wrote:
Presumably, one should feel comfortable using a device at the
published operating temperature extremes "forever".
 But, what sort of derating likely went into that specification
in the first place?  Sad another way, how much *beyond* those
limits might want suspect you could operate the device?
Well, a quick canvas of colleagues suggests derating isn't
even a consideration!  Rather, that the operating environment
is used to drive the design, with no real effort to quantify
actual device operating limits:
   "We know the characteristics of the components that we
    use and the general characteristics of the enclosure
    to convince ourselves that we can meet the expected
    operating temperature range"
And, what exactly *is* that range?
    "<mumble>"
Amusingly, for consumer devices, you rarely even see these
limits published.  Or, KNOW that they are bogus;
- TVs claiming 5-35C
- cordless phones 25C +- 10
- HiFi kit with NO environmental constraints
- laptops?
- cell phones (95F with storage to 113 means "not here"!)
So, all of the TVs mounted (here) in garages or on back porches
have been inoperable once the outdoor temperature exceeded 100F?
And, don't dare walk outdoors with your cordless phone or $1000
cell phone lest it stop working mid call!
HiFi?  Will it quit at 76F? or 62F?
It's amusing that folks don't seem to know the constraints of
the devices they are producing!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jun 24 * Operating temperature derating31Don Y
3 Jun 24 +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Operating temperature derating3Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 i `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
5 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating2Don Y
5 Jun 24 i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
6 Jun 24 `* Re: Operating temperature derating23legg
6 Jun 24  `* Re: Operating temperature derating22Don Y
7 Jun 24   `* Re: Operating temperature derating21legg
7 Jun 24    +* Re: Operating temperature derating16Don Y
7 Jun 24    i`* Re: Operating temperature derating15legg
8 Jun 24    i `* Re: Operating temperature derating14Don Y
8 Jun 24    i  +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
8 Jun 24    i  `* Re: Operating temperature derating12legg
8 Jun 24    i   `* Re: Operating temperature derating11Don Y
8 Jun 24    i    `* Re: Operating temperature derating10KevinJ93
8 Jun 24    i     `* Re: Operating temperature derating9Don Y
12 Jun 24    i      `* Re: Operating temperature derating8legg
12 Jun 24    i       `* Re: Operating temperature derating7Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        +* Re: Operating temperature derating2legg
14 Jun 24    i        i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        `* Re: Operating temperature derating4KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i         `* Re: Operating temperature derating3Don Y
14 Jun 24    i          `* Re: Operating temperature derating2KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i           `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
8 Jun 24    `* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
8 Jun 24     `* Re: Operating temperature derating3legg
8 Jun 24      `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
9 Jun 24       `- Re: Operating temperature derating1legg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal