Sujet : Re: Quantum mystics
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 09. Jun 2024, 22:04:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <66660acb$0$3747319$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/9/2024 2:46 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
He did
not mention that you have to make *correlated* measurements to
detect entanglement. For that, you need to communicate *what*
measurement is to be made at each location, and that implies
that you either prescribe the exact measurement in advance or
select a subset of the results after the fact.
Sounds like stuff from the "stuff everyone knows" department.
Maybe one of those cases where the presenter has spent so much time at a certain level they overestimate the background of the audience.