Re: Operating temperature derating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Operating temperature derating
De : kevin_es (at) *nospam* whitedigs.com (KevinJ93)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 13. Jun 2024, 21:42:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4fi3n$2dul1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/12/24 12:26 PM, Don Y wrote:
<...>
It's been above 100F (38C) for 16 days, already.  People are still working
their normal outdoor jobs, looking at cars on dealer lots, walking 100 yards
across uncovered parking lots to gain entry to stores, etc.
 Are phones NOT expected to work in these environments?  (Gee, I wanted to
telephone emergency services to get help for my buddy who collapsed in
the heat but it was too hot for my phone to make the call)
The phones may not stop working but may not meet performance specifications. For example applications may not work as fast as at lower temperatures.
I've never heard of lower level software being compromised at high temperatures so basic phone calls would be ok but action video games would run slower.
The ASICs I worked on had a -25C to +75C operating range. When the CPU was idle the phone would be too hot to hold if the internals were at 75C.

We expect cars to continue to operate in those temperatures.  What's the
criteria that we use to determine what should and shouldn't be expected
to remain operational?
Automotive devices that expect to be in the engine compartment are designed for -40C to +125C or +150C.
kw
<...>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jun 24 * Operating temperature derating31Don Y
3 Jun 24 +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Operating temperature derating3Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 i `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
5 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating2Don Y
5 Jun 24 i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
6 Jun 24 `* Re: Operating temperature derating23legg
6 Jun 24  `* Re: Operating temperature derating22Don Y
7 Jun 24   `* Re: Operating temperature derating21legg
7 Jun 24    +* Re: Operating temperature derating16Don Y
7 Jun 24    i`* Re: Operating temperature derating15legg
8 Jun 24    i `* Re: Operating temperature derating14Don Y
8 Jun 24    i  +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
8 Jun 24    i  `* Re: Operating temperature derating12legg
8 Jun 24    i   `* Re: Operating temperature derating11Don Y
8 Jun 24    i    `* Re: Operating temperature derating10KevinJ93
8 Jun 24    i     `* Re: Operating temperature derating9Don Y
12 Jun 24    i      `* Re: Operating temperature derating8legg
12 Jun 24    i       `* Re: Operating temperature derating7Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        +* Re: Operating temperature derating2legg
14 Jun 24    i        i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        `* Re: Operating temperature derating4KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i         `* Re: Operating temperature derating3Don Y
14 Jun 24    i          `* Re: Operating temperature derating2KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i           `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
8 Jun 24    `* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
8 Jun 24     `* Re: Operating temperature derating3legg
8 Jun 24      `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
9 Jun 24       `- Re: Operating temperature derating1legg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal