Re: Operating temperature derating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Operating temperature derating
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 14. Jun 2024, 03:13:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4g5gc$2hl8l$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 6/13/2024 4:51 AM, legg wrote:

What's your actual problem?
>
If I have a device that claims an operating (or storage) temperature range
of [X,Y] what is the ACTUAL operating range LIKELY *designed* into the device.

I think, at this stage, you're just being fractious.
And I think you're just unable to answer the question.  Don't feel bad;
I've asked this in two other places and have been met with similar
<mumbly> answers.  No one seems to design "consumer kit" so there are no
REAL processes to describe.  Commercial and Industrial designs are
handled much differently and more formally.
But, what the question HAS done is piqued interest in the *specifics*
of various bits of consumer kit; so, lots of examples of specific devices
with:
- UNspecified operating limits
- "fantasy" operating limits,
- limits that obviously have HUGE margins (e.g., the phone examples)
- *seemingly* well thought out limits (inferred by the wider range of
   operating conditions that obviously exceed the sorts of conditions
   they would likely experience... "temperatures never encountered on earth").
It seems like folks have suddenly become aware that they *don't* know
what the bits of kit that they've purchased CAN do and are now taking an
active interest in those figures.
It's educational to see which types of devices fit in each category as well
as which manufacturers.
But, still doesn't answer the question posed (as none of the designers
of these items are apparently available to shed specific light on their
design process/criteria)

I'm out of here.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jun 24 * Operating temperature derating31Don Y
3 Jun 24 +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Operating temperature derating3Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 i `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
5 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Operating temperature derating2Don Y
5 Jun 24 i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Cursitor Doom
6 Jun 24 `* Re: Operating temperature derating23legg
6 Jun 24  `* Re: Operating temperature derating22Don Y
7 Jun 24   `* Re: Operating temperature derating21legg
7 Jun 24    +* Re: Operating temperature derating16Don Y
7 Jun 24    i`* Re: Operating temperature derating15legg
8 Jun 24    i `* Re: Operating temperature derating14Don Y
8 Jun 24    i  +- Re: Operating temperature derating1Phil Hobbs
8 Jun 24    i  `* Re: Operating temperature derating12legg
8 Jun 24    i   `* Re: Operating temperature derating11Don Y
8 Jun 24    i    `* Re: Operating temperature derating10KevinJ93
8 Jun 24    i     `* Re: Operating temperature derating9Don Y
12 Jun 24    i      `* Re: Operating temperature derating8legg
12 Jun 24    i       `* Re: Operating temperature derating7Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        +* Re: Operating temperature derating2legg
14 Jun 24    i        i`- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
13 Jun 24    i        `* Re: Operating temperature derating4KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i         `* Re: Operating temperature derating3Don Y
14 Jun 24    i          `* Re: Operating temperature derating2KevinJ93
14 Jun 24    i           `- Re: Operating temperature derating1Don Y
8 Jun 24    `* Re: Operating temperature derating4john larkin
8 Jun 24     `* Re: Operating temperature derating3legg
8 Jun 24      `* Re: Operating temperature derating2john larkin
9 Jun 24       `- Re: Operating temperature derating1legg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal