Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Jun 2024, 15:56:50
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <7nqt6j1uoakdnnqk37bvlj5vss03damatg@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:15:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Sat, 15 Jun 2024 07:55:40 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jl@650pot.com> wrote in <mjar6jtpa9o9thp9pvhlolqdu3hiemqumv@4ax.com>:
>
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 05:57:23 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:21:24 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jl@650pot.com> wrote in <dero6j1eempndp4h10029un6kfp75kfna6@4ax.com>:
>
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:13:16 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
New dart launcher may be better way to inject animals with drugs
Electromagnetic prototype could improve manufacturing
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240613161144.htm
>
Here the circuit etc..:
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/12/5/69
>
Fig 6 is horrible.
>
Hardly anybody does good circuit design these days.
>
Are you sure you understand the circuit?
What is wrong with it according to you?
>
Aside from being ugly, at least three things.
>
Name them!!!

Am I the only person here who designs electronics? Sigh, OK.

The resistive voltage divider R2 R3 wastes voltage and power.

The SCR high-side switch is crazy for several reasons.

The optocoupler into the second dc/dc converter makes no sense and is
probably unreliable.

Why do some people use optocouplers where both the input and output
are grounded? It becomes a low-beta NPN transisor.

Why switch only the second dc/dc converter?

>
>
>
As to bad design, astronauts now stuck on the ISS because the Boeing return module is defective.
Billions they did spend of tax money
US becoming more and more a lost empire...
>
That's fine, since the US never was an empire. But we did mostly
conquer the world by being what other people want to be.
>
Use Street View all over the world. Most places look like a suburb of
Houston.
>
>
China just did a sample return from the backside of the moon.
>
Why?
>
Human beings have curiosity
that is how we evolve.
The sample will teach us about how our universe (forming of the Moon specfically) happened.

We already have lots of moon dirt. It's not very interesting. The
Chinese thing is a political stunt. An expensive one.

Why would dirt from the farside of he moon be any different from the
rest of the moon dirt?

And if we can have a permanent base there, say as an in-between stop for further exploration of space.

Space is mostly vacuum. Why do we need to kill humans to "explore"
vacuum?

Later, when US astronuts land on Mars (if ever) they will find Chinese restaurants there
and they better bring some Chinese currency so they can pay forlanding rights and food.
>

A recent study suggests that people who go to Mars will have kidney
damage.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240611130413.htm

Humans in space make no sense.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 24 * OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun21Jan Panteltje
14 Jun 24 +* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun13john larkin
15 Jun 24 i`* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun12Jan Panteltje
15 Jun 24 i `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun11john larkin
16 Jun 24 i  +- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1Cursitor Doom
16 Jun 24 i  `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun9Jan Panteltje
16 Jun 24 i   `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun8john larkin
16 Jun 24 i    +- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1Jan Panteltje
16 Jun 24 i    `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun6Phil Hobbs
16 Jun 24 i     `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun5john larkin
16 Jun 24 i      +* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun2Phil Hobbs
16 Jun 24 i      i`- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1john larkin
17 Jun 24 i      `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun2Jeff Liebermann
17 Jun 24 i       `- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1john larkin
17 Jun 24 `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun7Lasse Langwadt
17 Jun 24  +* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun3john larkin
18 Jun 24  i`* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun2Lasse Langwadt
18 Jun 24  i `- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1john larkin
18 Jun 24  `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun3Jan Panteltje
20 Jun 24   `* Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun2Cursitor Doom
20 Jun 24    `- Re: OT: some electronics for a speed controlled electromagnetic gun1Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal