Re: Challenger

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:06:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

On 13/06/2024 3:11 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:49 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 

On 12/06/2024 8:43 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:55:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>

On 10/06/2024 8:05 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:47:50 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:29:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:08:26 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:21:52 +0100, Jeff Layman
<Jeff@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>

On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote:

>

So about as reliable a statistic as their figures for historical
CO2 in the atmosphere, then.

>
Not really. We've been observing the CO2 level in the atmosphere
continuously since 1958 and Manua Loa wasn't NASA.
>
The entirely independent Cape Grim observatory got going in 1976 -
it's run by Australia's CSIRO
>
https://capegrim.csiro.au/
>
and presents much the same story. It's southern hemisphere rather
than northern hemisphere so that the annual fluctuation isn't as
big.
>
NASA estimate of how many shuttles' they'd lose were just that -
they dated back to before they'd lost any.
>
You objections to the thoroughly reliable climate data involve your
demented conspiracy theory which has everybody involved in taking
the published the measurements consistently lying to the public for
more than sixty years.
>
Nobody even thought that anyone would bother until around 1990, when
global warming hit statistical significance, and the fossil carbon
extraction industry woke up the threat to their long term cash
flows.

>
Sorry, Bill. I've got better things to do than get drawn into another
of your pointless pissing contests.

>
Lying about the science evidence demonstrating that climate change is
happening is  a well-paid commercial activity. You aren't remotely
good enough at it to get paid for it, but that doesn't seem to stop
you hoping that you might.

 >

Nice try, Bill, but I'm not falling for it. I know a barb when I see it
and I'm not getting hooked. Try plying your trade on some other poor
sap.

 
You've gotten well hooked by climate change denial propaganda, and
thrashing around pretending to be sceptical is just more of your futile
attempts to evade the point. The barb is deeply embedded. You probably
need a brain implant to get off the hook, and you'd probably reject
functional brain tissue as incompatible with your right-wing goof
genome.

Nope. Still not tempted. You need to up your game, Bill.