Liste des Groupes | Revenir à e design |
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:47:57 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs<snip>
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:22:06 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 22:09:42 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:08:52 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:39:56 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:03:34 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>On a sunny day (Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:23:40 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in
<v571as$3rs0j$2@dont-email.me>:
>On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:19:49 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:32:56 -0700) it happened john
larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote in
<1ghb7jt3882078r19n6jjgtirv25q27805@4ax.com>:
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:56:36 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 06:05:21 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com>
wrote:
Living things can certainly pump up molecular energy states to makeEvolution proceeds by making random changes. The changes that survive have all had to work better than the system that preceded them.
visible light. Why couldn't they produce the population inversions
that enable stimulated emission and optical gain?
Why wouldn't they?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.