Re: Chinese semiconductors

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Chinese semiconductors
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 14:51:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5u8pb$132bh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 22/06/2024 12:07 am, john larkin wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:09:42 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
 
On 6/21/2024 15:11, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:41:42 +0300) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
<dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <v53ld7$34ang$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 6/19/2024 23:47, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:49:28 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 07:48:46 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:35:28 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:18:42 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jl@650pot.com> wrote in <9jl57jl75daa4rull8cpc0ung6hvbtkl5s@4ax.com>:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:53:34 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:00:23 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
<snip>

It is interesting how the crazy bad guys stick together. Hitler with
Mussolini and Stalin, Russia with China and  Belarus and the norks and
various terrorist states, patterns like that.
 Of course it's an uneasy alliance, since they really can't trust one
another.
Uneasy alliances are better than no alliance at all. The crazy bad guys are totally unattractive allies, so they have to scrape the bottom of the barrel if they want any help at all.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 Vietnam is of course afraid of China and is swinging towards the USA.
 
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Jun 24 * Chinese semiconductors28john larkin
18 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors2bitrex
19 Jun 24 i`- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Brian Gregory
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors21legg
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors20john larkin
19 Jun 24 i +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1john larkin
19 Jun 24 i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors18Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors17john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors15Cursitor Doom
19 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors14john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   i +* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
20 Jun 24 i   i i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
20 Jun 24 i   i i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors2Cursitor Doom
21 Jun 24 i   i i  `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors9Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors8Jan Panteltje
21 Jun 24 i   i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
1 Jul14:51 i   i   i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
21 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
22 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
22 Jun 24 i   i     +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Cursitor Doom
1 Jul14:59 i   i     `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
20 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Martin Rid
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
20 Jun 24 i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
30 Jun23:48 `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1The Running Man

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal