Re: Chinese semiconductors

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Chinese semiconductors
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 14:59:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5u976$132bh$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 22/06/2024 10:00 am, john larkin wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:27:57 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
 
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:11:46 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:41:42 +0300) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
<dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <v53ld7$34ang$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 6/19/2024 23:47, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:49:28 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 07:48:46 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:35:28 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:18:42 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jl@650pot.com> wrote in <9jl57jl75daa4rull8cpc0ung6hvbtkl5s@4ax.com>:
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:53:34 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:00:23 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
<snip>

Let's return to the lithium standard.
Nobody ever adopted it, and there's rather too much around to make practical to use it as a currency.
Money is just an abstraction, invented to serve a medium of exchange. Using lumps of rare metals as the medium of exchange made it more difficult for people to cheat, but block-chains serve the same purpose.
We need governments with enough sense to see it that way - not that there's much chance of that.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Jun 24 * Chinese semiconductors28john larkin
18 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors2bitrex
19 Jun 24 i`- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Brian Gregory
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors21legg
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors20john larkin
19 Jun 24 i +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1john larkin
19 Jun 24 i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors18Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors17john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors15Cursitor Doom
19 Jun 24 i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors14john larkin
19 Jun 24 i   i +* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
20 Jun 24 i   i i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
20 Jun 24 i   i i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors2Cursitor Doom
21 Jun 24 i   i i  `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: Chinese semiconductors9Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i  `* Re: Chinese semiconductors8Jan Panteltje
21 Jun 24 i   i   +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Dimiter_Popoff
21 Jun 24 i   i   i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
1 Jul14:51 i   i   i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
21 Jun 24 i   i   `* Re: Chinese semiconductors4Cursitor Doom
22 Jun 24 i   i    `* Re: Chinese semiconductors3john larkin
22 Jun 24 i   i     +- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Cursitor Doom
1 Jul14:59 i   i     `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Bill Sloman
20 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
19 Jun 24 +* Re: Chinese semiconductors3Martin Rid
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: Chinese semiconductors2john larkin
20 Jun 24 i `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1Jan Panteltje
30 Jun23:48 `- Re: Chinese semiconductors1The Running Man

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal