Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)

"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message news:u75bhjt3qfd74uv8bhabnr96eih9ni15rh@4ax.com...

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:34:29 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>

"piglet" <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:vf3ntu$i9cd$1@dont-email.me...

On 20/10/2024 7:59 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message news:2rjahj1m5itht9k5nlh5p9q11onumbbb5s@4ax.com...

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:32:45 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 10/20/24 19:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:

John Larkin has from time to time posted some elementary questions he
likes to torture his job applicants with. I'd like to propose one of my
own.
>
If I'm measuring 218 ohms between points A and B in this diagram, what is
the value of Rx?
>
https://disk.yandex.com/i/hxjWx0tDUCzxiA

>
517 Ohms.
>
Jeroen Belleman

>
Does R330 mean 0.33 ohms?
>
I hate that sort of notation, like 2k47.

>
I keep having difficulty not using it in LTSpice.
>
0.33 ohms would be 0R33
>
>

>
LT Spice will happily accept 2k47 for 2470 ohms - you can even use 0meg33 if you want for 330k in the old Soviet way

>
The reason I try to avoid it outside locations where it's not questioned is because there's always someone who will ask what does
2k7 mean? :)
>

>
piglet
>

>

>
The other legacy of unreliable dots (I suppose they used to fall off
drawings 50 years ago) is people who refuse to make a clean 4-way
connection with one dot.

Some people call them blobs and even with a blob I've had a four-way connection misinterpreted as a crossover.

They insist on using two 3-ways, two dots with a clumsy offset.

It's harder to misunderstand, but no doubt some people can.