Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)

"john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:jgadhjl2uj77q3gdls2tfjrdu5qe8j9vgp@4ax.com...

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:24:35 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>

john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:57:33 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>

Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>

"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message

news:risahjpn2kfue87dqm6t2461a966ncv9in@4ax.com...
>
[...] > >

Maybe european decimal points slide off drawings and fall on the
floor. Robust American decimal points and schematic connect dots don't
do that.

>
I wasn't aware that there was a difference between European and american
decimal points.

>
There is a difference between English-speking ones and French-speaking
ones: the French ones look like commas.

>
Do French engineers use the same convention on their schematics?

>
I don't know, but the comma is in everyday use as a decimal point.
>

I can't recall ever seeing a French schematic, actually.

>
I can - and it was dreadful !  It was of a laboratory R.F. signal
generator and they had put the earthing point in the centre with the
various sections of the circuit radiating like the spokes of a wheel
around it.  The HT line ran around the outside.
>
I don't think they do it like that nowadays.

>
There are people, even gigabuck organizations, who are obsessed with
single-point grounding.

Decoupling capacitors such as 0.1uF everywhere can also be an obsession.
Remove them from many (not all) circuits with no change in performance.

>
That gets crazy fast.