Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)

On 27/10/2024 12:34 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:55:10 +0100, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
 

john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 01:59:03 +0200, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> wrote:
>

On 10/20/24 23:17, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 01:18:29 +0530, Pimpom <Pimpom@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>

On 21-10-2024 12:46 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 12:12:22 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:59:18 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>

"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message
news:2rjahj1m5itht9k5nlh5p9q11onumbbb5s@4ax.com...

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:32:45 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 10/20/24 19:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:

<snip>

I once heard the BBC's ' Environment Analyst' describe air pressure in
Degrees Centigrade.

 That's what happens in organisations like the BBC where capability in a
given field comes a poor second to racial and gender recruiting quotas.

Twaddle. The English have never regarded literacy in science as any kind of cultural necessity.
They wouldn't recruit the anybody with explicit scientific training because they had had that training - scientists are on tap, not on top.
You own bizarre ideas about global warming are all too representative of the UK attitude. You know very little about the subject, but still think that you can read the literature and form your own opinion, which you imagine to be quite as valid as the opinions of people who know quite a bit more.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney