Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 31. Oct 2024, 16:07:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <j677ijlijr3h875hu47oge5i5e41o8b1e1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:01:30 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 31-Oct-24 8:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
SRAM scaling isn't dead after all — TSMC's 2nm process tech claims major improvements
  https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/sram-scaling-isnt-dead-after-all-tsmcs-2nm-process-tech-claims-major-improvements#main
 
gate all around tech...
  38 Mb/mm^2
 
If my arithmetic is right, there are about 50 atoms of silicon per cubic
nanometre. Surely we're approaching the limits of this.
>
Sylvia.

The cell structure would be interesting. Six transistors?

I'd love it if our uPs had a lot more SRAM.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Oct 24 * 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM12Jan Panteltje
31 Oct 24 `* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM11Sylvia Else
31 Oct 24  +- Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM1john larkin
31 Oct 24  `* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM9Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24   +- Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM1Phil Hobbs
31 Oct 24   +- Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM1john larkin
31 Oct 24   `* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM6Joe Gwinn
31 Oct 24    +* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM3Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24    i`* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM2Phil Hobbs
1 Nov 24    i `- Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM1Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24    `* Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM2john larkin
31 Oct 24     `- Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM1Joe Gwinn

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal