Sujet : Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 31. Oct 2024, 16:07:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <j677ijlijr3h875hu47oge5i5e41o8b1e1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:01:30 +0800, Sylvia Else <
sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 31-Oct-24 8:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
SRAM scaling isn't dead after all TSMC's 2nm process tech claims major improvements
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/sram-scaling-isnt-dead-after-all-tsmcs-2nm-process-tech-claims-major-improvements#main
gate all around tech...
38 Mb/mm^2
If my arithmetic is right, there are about 50 atoms of silicon per cubic
nanometre. Surely we're approaching the limits of this.
>
Sylvia.
The cell structure would be interesting. Six transistors?
I'd love it if our uPs had a lot more SRAM.