Re: switchmode gyrator

On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:49:55 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:49:13 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>

On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 06:08:40 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>

>
>
Inductors are awful. Their energy storage is worse than electrolytic
caps by about a factor of 1000.
>
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/326177/energy-density-comparison-between-inductors-and-capacitors
>
One could in theory make a switchmode gyrator that would make a
capacitor look like a programmable-value inductor.
>
I have an application for that, but it would take too much engineering
and runtime complexity to make it worth doing. I guess I'll just have
to buy a bunch of giant, heavy custom toroids.

>
I'm sure that there are other reasons why an inductor
will be used besides the lack of time/energy/resources
to 'design them out'.
>
Energy storage is just one means to an end.
>
RL

>
Sure. We want to design some dummy loads that will simulate relays,
solenoids, stepper motors, torque motors, with programmable R and L.
Seemed to me that using caps to make fake inductors would be a good
way to do that.
>
It's at least an interesting idea to play with. Maybe we can
switchmode simulate R+L all at once. We would have to store energy and
dissipate power to do that.
>
>
>
>

Loads - the simpler the better unless there's a return on
the investment.

I guess I'll just have to buy a bunch of giant, heavy custom toroids.

One nice rhing about inductors is that they tend not to
break.

Unless it's meant to fly or be hand-carried, weight doesn't
sell. Used to be a factor in shipping costs.

RL