Sujet : Re: Datasheet-flation?
De : jeffl (at) *nospam* cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 23. Nov 2024, 21:40:15
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <i4e4kjl39fce3g08k6vm9he7bspfm4ppii@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:50:54 -0700, Don Y
<
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
The data "sheet" for the new processor I'm using is ~16,000 pages.
(note carefully the position of the comma separator)
I suggest you switch to a RISC processor. Fewer instructions implies
that there might be fewer pages of documentation. Let's see if that
works.
The RISC-V instruction set manual is 238 PDF pages:
<
https://riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/riscv-spec.pdf>
while the Intel 64 and IA-32 combined developer manual is 5,237 PDF
pages:
<
https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/835781/325462-sdm-vol-1-2abcd-3abcd-4.pdf>
Yep. More instructions means more pages.
This is getting ridiculous. I thought 2,000 page datasheets were
over the top, but this one is a personal record! <frown>
Nobody RTFM's the entire manual. You're not expected to read and
understand everything, just the part that is useful for whatever
you're doing. I have numerous books where I've only read a few
relevant chapters, skimmed a few others, and ignored the rest. When
you lookup a telephone number in a telephone directory, do you read
the entire directory? Same with modern devices, which are often full
of features that you'll never need or use.
-- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.comPO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.comBen Lomond CA 95005-0272Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558