Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 27. Nov 2024, 21:47:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <um0fkjpmvbovchv7tkecj63lmg11r8iioh@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:34:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:42:54 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
>
On 26/11/2024 03:15, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:55:35 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
 
>
There is some ageing nuclear still running and large scale biomass
greenwashed wood burning facilities like Drax (sounds like a Bond villain).
>
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68381160
 
Having electricity used to be normal.
>
Most of the time we still do. But the final leg of the electricity
distribution was sold off and the vulture capitalists found a cunning
way to extract value by ceasing to do any preventative maintenance!
>
The US "regulated monopoly" scheme, shareholder-owned companies with
guaranted returns and  performance incentives, worked great for 100
years, until the regulation got amped up (pun intended).
>
The power here is very reliable. Sometimes something local, an old
transformer or something, breaks, but they fix it fast. City-wide
outages are very rare, basically unknown, between earthquakes.
>
An old wood pole leaned over and broke on our block a couple weeks
ago, and we lost power. An army of PG&E guys and trucks and heavy
equipment moved in and installed a new pole in about 5 hours.
>
The fix was amusing. I'll post a pic.
>

PG&E did a clean fast  job repacing the pole and restringing the high
power wires.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3xscsxd9urda2ct6kr4t2/Arbor_Pole_1.jpg?rlkey=69affbdc9x1wofbhlkcx1kse8&raw=1

But they are not responsible for the mess of POTS, cable, fiber, and
whatever was below, so they just chopped off that part of the old pole
and strapped it on.

The City intends to underground all the wiring some day. I figure it
will take 75 years and a hundred billion dollars.

Too bad they didn't dig big utility tunnels back when gas and
electricity were invented.

Note that we don't have a high ground wire like many places do. We
basically never get lightning strikes here.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Nov 24 * 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems68Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3legg
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Jeroen Belleman
24 Nov 24 i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems39TTman
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems38Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems35john larkin
24 Nov 24 i i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3TTman
24 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
25 Nov 24 i ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems30Martin Brown
26 Nov 24 i i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems29john larkin
26 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
26 Nov 24 i i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
27 Nov 24 i i  i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
27 Nov 24 i i  i i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
27 Nov 24 i i  i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems21Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems7Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i i   i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i i   i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i     +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i     i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i i     ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
1 Dec 24 i i     ii +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Ian
1 Dec 24 i i     ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i i     i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i i     `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24 i i      `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Don Y
24 Nov 24 i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
24 Nov 24 i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5TTman
24 Nov 24 ii+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 ii+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
24 Nov 24 iii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1TTman
25 Nov 24 ii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Joe Gwinn
25 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don Y
25 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Robert Roland
30 Nov 24 `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems12Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
1 Dec 24  i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Clive Arthur
3 Dec 24  i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
3 Dec 24  i  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
3 Dec 24  i  i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i    `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24  i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal