Re: Damned Projects!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Damned Projects!
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 31. Dec 2024, 18:59:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1r5fyrq.y1n5sy1ikmk4gN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

Carlos E.R. wrote:
Don wrote:
Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.
>
Use graphite. Two pencil leads.
 
You can probably adapt this technique to the task:
 
    Make your own non-inductive graphite resistors
    <http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/graphite.htm>
 
Is electrolysis mitigation the sole benefit of using AC instead of DC?
Is there any other reason to prefer AC?

There are two effects caused by electrolysis: it attacks the electrodes
and it builds up a non-conductive film of gasses.  Even if the
electrodes are made of something non-corrodable like carbon or platinum,
the sensor will rapidly go high imnpedance because of the gas film..
For both short and long-term stability, it is better to use AC.

Another problem is detecting the change caused by an increase in
conductivity.  A pair of electrodes will develop an electrode potential
of possible more than 1V, the sensing system for DC needs a signal
significantly greater than this for reliable operation.  High voltages
will overcome the gassifying effect but may lead to the formation of
reaction products between the electrodes and the electrolyte, which may
turn out to be poisonous.

The last thing you want to discover if your kitchen floods is that the
sensor has rendered tha puddle electrically live and toxic.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Dec 24 * Damned Projects!38Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 +- Re: Damned Projects!1Phil Hobbs
27 Dec 24 +* Re: Damned Projects!16john larkin
27 Dec 24 i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 i`* Re: Damned Projects!14Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 i `* Re: Damned Projects!13Arie de Muijnck
27 Dec 24 i  `* Re: Damned Projects!12Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 i   `* Re: Damned Projects!11Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 i    +- Re: Damned Projects!1ehsjr
27 Dec 24 i    +* Re: Damned Projects!2Liz Tuddenham
28 Dec 24 i    i`- Re: Damned Projects!1Cursitor Doom
28 Dec 24 i    `* Re: Damned Projects!7mas
28 Dec 24 i     +* Re: Damned Projects!2Liz Tuddenham
29 Dec 24 i     i`- Re: Damned Projects!1Cursitor Doom
29 Dec 24 i     `* Re: Damned Projects!4Martin Brown
29 Dec 24 i      +- Re: Damned Projects!1mas
29 Dec 24 i      `* Re: Damned Projects!2Cursitor Doom
29 Dec 24 i       `- Re: Damned Projects!1Joe Gwinn
27 Dec 24 +* Re: Damned Projects!11Bill Sloman
27 Dec 24 i`* Re: Damned Projects!10Don
27 Dec 24 i +* Re: Damned Projects!3Liz Tuddenham
29 Dec 24 i i`* Re: Damned Projects!2Don
29 Dec 24 i i `- Re: Damned Projects!1Liz Tuddenham
29 Dec 24 i `* Re: Damned Projects!6Carlos E.R.
31 Dec 24 i  +* Re: Damned Projects!3Don
31 Dec 24 i  i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Joe Gwinn
31 Dec 24 i  i`- Re: Damned Projects!1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Damned Projects!2Martin Brown
5 Jan 25 i   `- Re: Damned Projects!1Cursitor Doom
27 Dec 24 +- Re: Damned Projects!1bitrex
27 Dec 24 +- Re: Damned Projects!1Jeff Layman
28 Dec 24 +* Re: Damned Projects!6Wanderer
29 Dec 24 i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Bill Sloman
29 Dec 24 i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Cursitor Doom
29 Dec 24 i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Don
29 Dec 24 i+- Re: Damned Projects!1Don
29 Dec 24 i`- Re: Damned Projects!1Carlos E.R.
28 Dec 24 `- Re: Damned Projects!1Lasse Langwadt

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal