Re: OT: Typical Globlist

On 1/15/2025 6:01 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

Part of the problem was too many trees and other plants close together -
I don't notice anyone campaigning about that.

Of course not!  "It's so 'quaint' living amidst the trees and wildlife..."
There are costs to every decision; if you want to live amongst the trees,
then be prepared to flee in an instant AND *lose* your belongings/life.
The same holds true of living in Tornado Alley, along the Gulf Coast
(hurricanes), on active fault lines, in the shadow of active volcanos,
BELOW sea level, etc.
PAYING people to live in these places (which is what subsidizing their
recoveries does) is just silly.
The insurers know the costs of these decisions.  Just like they know the
LIKELY cost of your teenage driver buying/operating a sportscar!
Regardless of "reason", their costs reflect FACTS.

Trees don't destroy CO2, they simply store it and release it later,
either as CO2 or as methane.

And all trees eventually die.  It's just adding a giant lag to the
system -- to compensate for other issues.