Sujet : Re: OT: Typical Globlist
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Jan 2025, 15:43:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmlnff$364is$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/01/2025 11:40 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:44:06 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:45:07 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:01:17 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:17:12 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:49:31 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
<snip>
Bad idea. He'll start throwing in barbs and before you know it, you've
been hooked and sucked in again. Old Bill's a master angler!
As noted, his saying anything intelligent about electronic design is
extremely improbable.
Anything that John Larkin could recognise as intelligent.
And all he does is fling coarse insults, whether I respond to him or
not.
Anything short of fulsome flattery strikes him as a coarse insult.
He doesn't matter.
Not to John Larkin. I don't flatter him about his circuit design skills, and that what he is hunting for here.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Typical Globlist
Re: OT: Typical Globlist