Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 00:50:10 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnn0gk$i856$1@dont-email.me...

On 2/02/2025 3:05 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnmpgh$dafg$1@dont-email.me...

On 2/02/2025 4:26 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnl3gl$30im$1@dont-email.me...

On 1/02/2025 4:37 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnka4g$3ut8i$1@dont-email.me...

On 1/02/2025 1:34 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnim5i$3hnrj$1@dont-email.me...

On 31/01/2025 5:47 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

Approaching 130dB now. Any suggestions for improvement?

...

I'll pass.

>
If your circuit design skills are demonstrated by a circuit which uses 93 components (which includes 9 transistors and 10
integrated
circuits) and only gets 60dB down on harmonics then I agree that pass is for the best.

>
If you think that circuit design skills can be assessed by counting components, we can draw our own conclusions.

>
Stop making me laugh please Bill.

If you are unemployable and never build what you simulate, more parts
are no problem.

Who is "we" anyway. You sound like you speak for everyone here.

That's the Royal We.