Re: OT: Twitter/X

On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 07:56:39 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 13:18:15 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>

On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 05:57:54 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
>

On 2025-02-02, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:

Gentlemen,
>
I've just noticed the vast majority (no exaggeration) of my Twitter
(X) following consists of young women with huge backsides keen to
flaunt the goods in their profile photos. I have nothing in common
with them and I can't believe they have any interest in the subjects I
post about. WTF is going on here? Has anyone else encountered this
situation? If I was in some group on X dedicated to discussing young
women with large bums I could understand it, but I'm not.

>
They might not be actual humans, and if they are those might not be their
actual images.  Don't click adverts unless you want to see more of the
same.

>
To be honest, I wouldn't really mind seeing more of the same. :)

>
In real life, the slim nerdy ones are the keepers.

Yep, grab the flat-chested broad; can't go wrong.

Curvy young women and atheletic dudes peak early and go to fat.

Not to mention the narcissism and sense of entitlement that goes hand
in hand with good looks (most of them anyway).

I haven't met many fat EEs, and no very good fat EEs.

The brain burns calories at a tidy rate when it's working furiously.
It's good to keep active. I've never known a single CW operator who
developed dementia.
Bill Sloman sits around all day tapping away on his computer insulting
people. Hasn't shown any signs of dementia yet, other than a shrinking
vocabulary which may or may not be related.
Did I mention I have 10 people all calling themselves Elon Musk
following me on Twitter/X? If I didn't, I have 10 people all calling
themselves Elon Musk following me on Twitter/X.