Re: programmable circuit breaker

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: programmable circuit breaker
De : jrwalliker (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John R Walliker)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 06. Mar 2025, 00:03:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqal7c$2ao3h$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 05/03/2025 21:29, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:05:55 -0000 (UTC), piglet
<erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
 
Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
[...]
Maybe I shouldn't diode clamp the relay coils. I'll have to test the
dropout time.
>
Put a resistor in series with the clamp diode, the value can be chosen
to keep the inductive spike just below the maximum allowable voltage and
that will give the fastest turn-off.  By using higher voltage switching
transistors you can have a higher voltage spike and a faster turn-off -
but there is the risk that the spike might be capacitively coupled to
somewhere vulnerable to damage.
>
>
>
Or even just a resistor and no diode! The extra few percent current
consumption is often not a problem and a resistor is very reliable, more
durable than a diode.
 I tried a BSS123 logic-level mosfet driving my 12-volt 33 mA relay
coil. It avalanches at about 120 volts and runs cool at 20 Hz.
 I'l let it run for a zillion cycles, but it's noisy.
 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/i9xxdnw7bveuegm373sky/ALKsKJsIlT1fWhCehkHaa8w?rlkey=5ttkfyzl52prxvyd7xztguzh4&dl=0
When I tried a similar experiment I found that there was no
significant improvement in relay opening time once the flyback
reached 5 times the operating voltage.
Maybe a 50V mosfet that avalanches at about 60V would achieve the
same benefit but with less noise.
There are mosfets intended for automotive fuel injector drivers
that are rated for repeated avalanche operation.
John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * programmable circuit breaker26john larkin
5 Mar 25 +* Re: programmable circuit breaker14piglet
5 Mar 25 i+* Re: programmable circuit breaker12Phil Hobbs
5 Mar 25 ii`* Re: programmable circuit breaker11john larkin
5 Mar 25 ii `* Re: programmable circuit breaker10Liz Tuddenham
5 Mar 25 ii  +* Re: programmable circuit breaker4john larkin
6 Mar 25 ii  i`* Re: programmable circuit breaker3Lasse Langwadt
6 Mar 25 ii  i `* Re: programmable circuit breaker2Liz Tuddenham
6 Mar 25 ii  i  `- Re: programmable circuit breaker1john larkin
5 Mar 25 ii  +* Re: programmable circuit breaker2Don Y
5 Mar 25 ii  i`- Re: programmable circuit breaker1Don Y
5 Mar 25 ii  `* Re: programmable circuit breaker3piglet
5 Mar 25 ii   `* Re: programmable circuit breaker2john larkin
6 Mar 25 ii    `- Re: programmable circuit breaker1John R Walliker
5 Mar 25 i`- Re: programmable circuit breaker1Liz Tuddenham
5 Mar 25 +* Re: programmable circuit breaker7bp
5 Mar 25 i`* Re: programmable circuit breaker6john larkin
5 Mar 25 i `* Re: programmable circuit breaker5bp
5 Mar 25 i  `* Re: programmable circuit breaker4john larkin
5 Mar 25 i   `* Re: programmable circuit breaker3bp
5 Mar 25 i    `* Re: programmable circuit breaker2john larkin
6 Mar 25 i     `- Re: programmable circuit breaker1bp
6 Mar 25 `* Re: programmable circuit breaker4Buzz McCool
6 Mar 25  `* Re: programmable circuit breaker3john larkin
9 Mar 25   `* Re: programmable circuit breaker2Klaus Kragelund
9 Mar 25    `- Re: programmable circuit breaker1Klaus Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal