Sujet : Re: OT: Greenland
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 30. Mar 2025, 14:59:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsbiou$1inff$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 31/03/2025 12:00 am, Dan Green wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 18:42:43 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 3/29/2025 1:44 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Well, I thought DT was joking about seizing Greenland, but it appears
he's serious! That's quite a bold move to say the least! Leaving aside
the right/wrong debate over such a move, does it not now give China a
free pass to seize the territory first - if it can act fast enough -
since the unthinkable has not only been thought, but spoken aloud as a
stated plan as well? I mean it kind of confers legitimacy on arbitrary
territorial seizures if the US can do it, wouldn't you say?
>
Your pal,
>
CD
>
If the US losing to Vietnam and Afghanistan felt bad, imagine how bad
losing to Denmark will feel..
Trump better not try any of that nonsense with Canada or he'll have
King Charles to reckon with! :)
George the third wasn't up to changing George Washington's mind, and Charles the third is unlikely to do any better with Donald Trump. George Washington had a mind that presumably could be changed - he did seem to change his mind about chopping down that cherry tree when he was a kid. Donald Trump's mind is rather more erratic.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Greenland
Re: OT: Greenland