Re: energy in UK

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: energy in UK
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Apr 2025, 18:07:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtoo4h$2lpg4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16/04/2025 15:36, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:39:57 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
 
On 16/04/2025 00:17, john larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:04:37 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
>
UK national infrastructure has been privatised and robbed blind by
vulture capitalists since the 1980's. It isn't just electricity that is
problematic London's water supply was in dire danger of going bust too.
>
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66051555
>
It is ultimately all about very clever financial engineering to load the
balance sheet with debt and pay handsome dividends to foreign owners.
>
Penny wise and pound foolish for the the UK.
>
There will never be enough batteries to power even a tiny country like
the UK,  to keep people alive through a few weeks of cold, dark, still
weather.
>
I'm inclined to agree. But provided that you use nuclear power
generation for the base load you only need about 60GWhr of battery
storage to time shift night time electricity to cover the daytime.
 Why build insanely expensive and dangerous battery farms so you can
run the nukes at 200% capacity half the time and 0% the rest?
You can't ramp nukes up and down fast enough daily to cope without causing other problems (and we have nowhere near enough of them). They are incredibly slow to build and UK lost most of its capable nuclear engineers over a decade or so ago. Efforts keeping the last remaining ones still operational are getting a bit scary.
When I was at school there was a big surplus of them (nuclear engineers) most of whom ended up as bad physics teachers. A product Harold Wilson's white heat of technology "electricity too cheap to meter" initiative.

We're lucky to have a good deal of hydro and lots of natural gas, both
easily tunable to varying loads. Power is very reliable here.
Power in the UK for the moment is reliable, but they have been skating on *very* thin ice for a long time in winter (roughly two decades of prevarication).

UK BESS operators should be limited to having a substation capable of
recharging their storage capacity at the C/8 rate so that they can
recharge during the slack hours (2200-1800) in winter and then resupply
at peak times (0900-2100) major evening peak is 1800-2100. In summer it
is much less of a problem - the system really creaks in winter.
 Fine, let someone do that without subsidies.
 
>
They like to charge at C/2 to exploit the pricing algorithm glitches and
isn't all that good for the batteries.
>
It would take an impossibly large battery storage capacity to handle a
long becalmed event in mid winter. The numbers that NESO bandy around
for UK net zero by 2030/50 (delete as appropriate) are pure fantasy.
 Socialist and communist governments substitute politicians for
engineers.
The main damage was done by the Tories - a right wing party.

I'm fighting a plan to build the world's largest BESS on my doorstep.
It would be hard to find a worse spot to put one. We are sat on the
choke point where the 400kV lines are routinely overloaded in winter.
 We had a pretty big lithium battery fire here recently.
 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/01/23/moss-landing-lithium-battery-plant-fire-vistra/77912642007/
 nice video:
 https://apnews.com/article/battery-storage-plant-fire-california-moss-landing-7c561fed096f410ddecfb04722a8b1f8
I know. The Moss landing fire in January got the attention of all our neighbouring parish councils out to a 5 mile radius. My friends who work in Silicon valley could smell it burning from about 20 miles away. A lot more help was forthcoming after that event.
Our BESS will be ~10% bigger than Moss Landing if it goes ahead. Vistra doesn't exactly have a stellar safety reputation but the company doing ours is a start-up with no track record at all on any scale!
Rather brave to try and do three of the worlds largest BESS within 20 miles of each other. The one on Teesside actually makes engineering sense - it can buffer the offshore windfarms that come ashore there...
https://www.renewableinstitute.org/plans-unveiled-to-construct-a-1-billion-battery-storage-facility-in-the-north-east-of-england/
However, the entire Teesside regeneration scheme is all a bit dodgy.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Apr 25 * energy in UK175john larkin
13 Apr 25 +* Re: energy in UK172Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 i+* Re: energy in UK3Liz Tuddenham
13 Apr 25 ii`* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 ii `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i`* Re: energy in UK168Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK18Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i+* Re: energy in UK14Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: energy in UK13Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: energy in UK12Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: energy in UK11Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: energy in UK10Jim Jackson
14 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: energy in UK9Liz Tuddenham
15 Apr 25 i ii     `* Re: energy in UK8Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i ii      `* Re: energy in UK7Liz Tuddenham
16 Apr 25 i ii       `* Re: energy in UK6Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 i ii        `* Re: energy in UK5Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25 i ii         +- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25 i ii         `* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
20 Apr 25 i ii          `* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
20 Apr 25 i ii           `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Cursitor Doom
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK7john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i`* Re: energy in UK6Jeroen Belleman
14 Apr 25 i i `* Re: energy in UK5john larkin
15 Apr 25 i i  `* Re: energy in UK4Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i   `* Re: energy in UK3john larkin
16 Apr 25 i i    `* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
16 Apr 25 i i     `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i `* Re: energy in UK140Don Y
15 Apr 25 i  `* Re: energy in UK139Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK96Don Y
16 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: energy in UK95Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: energy in UK94Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: energy in UK11KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i`* Re: energy in UK10Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i `* Re: energy in UK9KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  +* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i`* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  `* Re: energy in UK5Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i   `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i    `* Re: energy in UK3wmartin
18 Apr 25 i   i  i     `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i      `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: energy in UK82Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK76Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i`* Re: energy in UK75Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK39Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK38Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `* Re: energy in UK37Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  +* Re: energy in UK35Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i+* Re: energy in UK32Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii`* Re: energy in UK31Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii `* Re: energy in UK30Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  +* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i`* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  `* Re: energy in UK26KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii   `* Re: energy in UK25Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    +* Re: energy in UK20Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i+* Re: energy in UK18Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK17Carlos E.R.
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK16Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK15Carlos E.R.
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii   `* Re: energy in UK14Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    +* Re: energy in UK9Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i+* Re: energy in UK7Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK6Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK5Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  +* Re: energy in UK2Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  i`- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii   `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    `* Re: energy in UK4Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     +* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii     `* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii      `* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii       `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i`* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i `* Re: energy in UK32Carlos E.R.
17 Apr 25 i   i   i  `* Re: energy in UK31Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i   `* Re: energy in UK30Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i`* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i `* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i  `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK2john larkin
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    `* Re: energy in UK19Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2Theo
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i   `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK18john larkin
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
25 Apr 25 i   `* Re: energy in UK20Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 `* Re: energy in UK2john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal