Re: acoustic imager

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: acoustic imager
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 22:53:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <4n680k1oir40dmelbfo140cocusrpbgb3h@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 14:06:29 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:48:49 GMT, Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void>
wrote:
>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:30:27 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:01:00 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
 
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:04:15 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
https://www.google.com/aclk?
sa=L&ai=DChsSEwjTjaDVg9uMAxW3Hq0GHVmKOlYYACICCAEQARoCcHY&co=1&cce=2&sig=AOD64_3aGs74magNuXwdRGFo7oP8zK-
LMQ&ctype=5&q=&adurl=
>
For 42,000 dollars? There's a product there you could develop, John.
 
It's only $19,998.99 from Fluke:
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke-ii905>
That might have been the price from before the tariffs arrived: "Ships
from supplier. Expected to arrive on or before Tue. May 06." "Country of
Origin: China (subject to change)"
>
Wrong model, the ii905 is missing some software features:
>
https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke-ii915
>
Has all functions for $25k, in stock.
>
Thanks.  I missed that they were difference model numbers.  Video
explains a few differences:
"Comparing the Fluke ‘SEE-Sound’ ii500, ii905, and ii915 Acoustic
Imagers"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br5hhjm5Aqo>  (1:56)
>
Fluke acoustic imager pages:
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/products/industrial-imaging>
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/search/fluke?query=ii900&facets=videos_en_us%2Cproducts_and_kits_en_us%2Cproduct_accessories_en_us&product_categories=Industrial%20imaging>
>
Bruel & Kjaer has been providing systems for acoustic imaging for decades,
a similar handheld system to the Fluke:
>
<https://media.hbkworld.com/m/be462d448ae9553b/original/BK-Connect-
Acoustic-Camera-Datasheet-bp2534.pdf>
>
Quite a bit more capable but probably not quite so cheap.
>
Cheap?  I can't afford any of them.  I'm still saving my pennies for
an IR camera.

Make sure you get a macro/close-up lens. I have a uni-T cam that has a
snap-on lens. You need that to image small electronic parts.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 25 * acoustic imager28john larkin
16 Apr 25 `* Re: acoustic imager27Cursitor Doom
16 Apr 25  +- Re: acoustic imager1John R Walliker
16 Apr 25  +* Re: acoustic imager21john larkin
16 Apr 25  i+* Re: acoustic imager2legg
16 Apr 25  ii`- Re: acoustic imager1John R Walliker
17 Apr 25  i`* Re: acoustic imager18Phil Hobbs
17 Apr 25  i `* Re: acoustic imager17john larkin
17 Apr 25  i  `* Re: acoustic imager16John R Walliker
18 Apr 25  i   `* Re: acoustic imager15Phil Hobbs
18 Apr 25  i    `* Re: acoustic imager14Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25  i     +* Re: acoustic imager2Phil Hobbs
18 Apr 25  i     i`- Re: acoustic imager1Liz Tuddenham
18 Apr 25  i     +* Re: acoustic imager2piglet
18 Apr 25  i     i`- Re: acoustic imager1Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25  i     `* Re: acoustic imager9john larkin
18 Apr 25  i      +* Re: acoustic imager7Cursitor Doom
19 Apr 25  i      i+* Re: acoustic imager5john larkin
19 Apr 25  i      ii+- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      ii`* Re: acoustic imager3Cursitor Doom
19 Apr 25  i      ii `* Re: acoustic imager2john larkin
19 Apr 25  i      ii  `- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      i`- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25  i      `- Re: acoustic imager1Bill Sloman
17 Apr 25  `* Re: acoustic imager4Jeff Liebermann
17 Apr 25   +- Re: acoustic imager1john larkin
19 Apr 25   `* Re: acoustic imager2Jeff Liebermann
19 Apr 25    `- Re: acoustic imager1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal