Sujet : Re: acoustic imager
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 19. Apr 2025, 22:53:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <4n680k1oir40dmelbfo140cocusrpbgb3h@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 14:06:29 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <
jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:48:49 GMT, Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void>
wrote:
>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:30:27 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:01:00 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:04:15 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
https://www.google.com/aclk?
sa=L&ai=DChsSEwjTjaDVg9uMAxW3Hq0GHVmKOlYYACICCAEQARoCcHY&co=1&cce=2&sig=AOD64_3aGs74magNuXwdRGFo7oP8zK-
LMQ&ctype=5&q=&adurl=
>
For 42,000 dollars? There's a product there you could develop, John.
It's only $19,998.99 from Fluke:
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke-ii905>
That might have been the price from before the tariffs arrived: "Ships
from supplier. Expected to arrive on or before Tue. May 06." "Country of
Origin: China (subject to change)"
>
Wrong model, the ii905 is missing some software features:
>
https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke-ii915
>
Has all functions for $25k, in stock.
>
Thanks. I missed that they were difference model numbers. Video
explains a few differences:
"Comparing the Fluke SEE-Sound ii500, ii905, and ii915 Acoustic
Imagers"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br5hhjm5Aqo> (1:56)
>
Fluke acoustic imager pages:
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/products/industrial-imaging>
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/search/fluke?query=ii900&facets=videos_en_us%2Cproducts_and_kits_en_us%2Cproduct_accessories_en_us&product_categories=Industrial%20imaging>
>
Bruel & Kjaer has been providing systems for acoustic imaging for decades,
a similar handheld system to the Fluke:
>
<https://media.hbkworld.com/m/be462d448ae9553b/original/BK-Connect-
Acoustic-Camera-Datasheet-bp2534.pdf>
>
Quite a bit more capable but probably not quite so cheap.
>
Cheap? I can't afford any of them. I'm still saving my pennies for
an IR camera.
Make sure you get a macro/close-up lens. I have a uni-T cam that has a
snap-on lens. You need that to image small electronic parts.