Re: LTSpice model for a SiC MOSFET

On 22/05/2025 1:37 am, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2025 09:42:11 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100jsf2$2n1hq$2@dont-email.me...

On 21/05/2025 3:44 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100ibpi$2at8a$2@dont-email.me...

On 20/05/2025 11:38 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100hb9s$24itl$3@dont-email.me...

On 20/05/2025 4:26 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100epio$1h4ca$1@dont-email.me...

On 19/05/2025 1:38 pm, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:23:54 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>

On 19/05/2025 12:15 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sun, 18 May 2025 18:11:58 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:

<snip>

Centuries ago they'd put two transistors in series in the TV horizontal deflection department because a single one didn't have
enough Vce max.

>
The transistor was invented in the 1950's. Decades ago is closer to the mark.

>
LOL sane people would have known what I meant without needing to point that out Bill.

>
Sane people don't say "centuries" when they mean "decades".

>
Does the word "hyperbole" mean anything to you Bill?

 He's obviously unwell.

Anybody who doesn't admire John Larkin as much as he feels he deserves to be admired is obviously defective - from his point of view - and John Larkin does like to think that they are unwell.
My medical acquaintances don't share his point of view.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney