Sujet : Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better)
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design comp.sys.raspberry-piDate : 20. Jun 2025, 02:46:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1032ehi$8dj9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:46:21 -0700, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 01:36:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
But you said “Edrawings is pretty good but needs a painful
re-licensing ordeal roughly twice a week. For every computer you
use it on.”
>
Not really twice a week. It times out in about a year, and it also
refuses to open .SLDASM files that were created by a more recent
version of SolidWorks.
So it hasn’t been keeping up with SolidWorks? Not really a good
substitute, then.
But most software and things like security camera services and many
web sites are increasingly annoying.
Make that “most *proprietary* software”.
SolidWorks is expensive ...
>
My point exactly.
>
Not too expensive for my guys to use to design things. Just too
expensive to use as a viewer. They could send me screen shots, but
it's fun to zoom and spin things around myself, which Edrawings
does. And it has the measure feature, so I can verify dimensions.
Does it have fly-through/walk-through modes?
It does all that cool stuff apparently instantaneously, even on the
wimpiest laptop without fancy graphics hardware.
That’s not a big deal any more.
<https://www.kicad.org/>
>
We use PADS. We've been using it since the DOS days when there was
basically nothing else.
Seems like it’s still around, but it’s gone cloud-only.
<
https://sourceforge.net/software/compare/KiCad-EDA-vs-PADS-Professional/>
Apparently KiCAD got some investment money from CERN.
<
https://www.reddit.com/r/KiCad/comments/wy20gi/wanting_to_switch_from_pads_to_kicad_is_it/>
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
17 Jun 25 | SolidWorks is cool, sort of | 52 | | john larkin |
17 Jun 25 |  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 50 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |   Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 49 | | john larkin |
18 Jun 25 |    Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 48 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |     Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 9 | | Sergey Kubushyn |
18 Jun 25 |      Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 6 | | Don Y |
18 Jun 25 |       Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
18 Jun 25 |       Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 4 | | Sergey Kubushyn |
18 Jun 25 |        Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 3 | | Don Y |
19 Jun 25 |         Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Sergey Kubushyn |
19 Jun 25 |          Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Don Y |
18 Jun 25 |      Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Crash Gordon |
18 Jun 25 |       Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Don Y |
18 Jun 25 |     Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 38 | | john larkin |
18 Jun 25 |      Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 37 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
18 Jun 25 |       Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 36 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |        Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 35 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
19 Jun 25 |         Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 34 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |          Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 23 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
19 Jun 25 |           Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 22 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 21 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
20 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 20 | | john larkin |
21 Jun 25 |              Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 19 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
21 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Don Y |
21 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
21 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | piglet |
21 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Don Y |
21 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
22 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 12 | | candycanearter07 |
22 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 8 | | john larkin |
22 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 4 | | Jeroen Belleman |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                   Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
22 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | The Natural Philosopher |
23 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
23 Jun 25 |                Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 3 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
23 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Don Y |
23 Jun 25 |                 Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |          Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 10 | | Lasse Langwadt |
19 Jun 25 |           Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 9 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 3 | | Lasse Langwadt |
20 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
20 Jun 25 |              Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
20 Jun 25 |            Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 5 | | The Natural Philosopher |
22 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 3 | | Don Y |
23 Jun 25 |              Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 2 | | Crash Gordon |
23 Jun 25 |               Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | Don Y |
22 Jun 25 |             Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) | 1 | | john larkin |
19 Jun 25 |  Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of | 1 | | Joe Gwinn |