Re: Positional/physical addressing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Positional/physical addressing
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 26. Jun 2025, 17:53:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1rejquw.1viv0gnzefpamN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

On 6/26/2025 1:59 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
This is too "high tech".  You're effectively trying to build a TDR into
each device.  Recall, I want these to be dirt cheap because I use so
many of them in a system.
 
Actually the individual devices just need to store the time between two
clear digital pulses as a number.  If the devices are never closer than
one yard apart, a 300 Mc/s clock speed will be sufficient to distinguish
between them.  (The twin identification pulses will be spaced by double
the path length.)
 
Sorry, this is a *display*.  Even as oversized as it is (a few
square feet), it is quite possible that devices will be immediately
adjacent -- a fraction of an inch apart.

I hadn't realised they were that close together.  Obviously my
suggestion fir timing is a non-starter.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Jun 25 * Positional/physical addressing25Don Y
24 Jun 25 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Martin Rid
24 Jun 25 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing7Don Y
24 Jun 25 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing6Don Y
24 Jun 25 i  +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Jeroen Belleman
25 Jun 25 i  i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Ian
25 Jun 25 i  i +- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun 25 i  i `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Jeroen Belleman
24 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun 25 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing11Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun 25 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing10Don Y
25 Jun 25 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing9Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Don Y
26 Jun09:59 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun10:46 i   i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
26 Jun17:53 i   i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun21:48 i   i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun20:58 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing2bitrex
26 Jun21:50 i   i`- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun21:00 i   `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1bitrex
25 Jun 25 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Ian
25 Jun 25 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
25 Jun 25 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Dennis
25 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun 25 `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal