Re: Positional/physical addressing

Liste des GroupesRevenir à e design 
Sujet : Re: Positional/physical addressing
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 26. Jun 2025, 21:50:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103kbrh$3lm8n$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/26/2025 12:58 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 6/25/2025 1:04 PM, Don Y wrote:
 
This is too "high tech".  You're effectively trying to build a TDR into
each device.  Recall, I want these to be dirt cheap because I use so many of
them in a system.
 You could tile 'em. A local bus north west south and east with the main IO bus on the perimeter.
 Send outputs towards the edge using a greedy algorithm that only needs local state and if a tile has failed then route around it.
But that requires a fair number of interconnects between devices (tiles).
And, likely a more complex (larger/costlier) implementation.
If I could guarantee (by design) that a failure looks like an
"absent" device, then things get considerably easier (as you
have to deal with the possibility of absences, regardless)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Jun 25 * Positional/physical addressing25Don Y
24 Jun17:18 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Martin Rid
24 Jun17:49 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing7Don Y
24 Jun18:05 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing6Don Y
24 Jun19:18 i  +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Jeroen Belleman
25 Jun18:30 i  i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Ian
25 Jun18:43 i  i +- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun22:29 i  i `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Jeroen Belleman
24 Jun22:36 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun09:52 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing11Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun10:14 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing10Don Y
25 Jun11:14 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing9Liz Tuddenham
25 Jun18:04 i  `* Re: Positional/physical addressing8Don Y
26 Jun09:59 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun10:46 i   i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
26 Jun17:53 i   i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Liz Tuddenham
26 Jun21:48 i   i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun20:58 i   +* Re: Positional/physical addressing2bitrex
26 Jun21:50 i   i`- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
26 Jun21:00 i   `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1bitrex
25 Jun18:40 +* Re: Positional/physical addressing4Ian
25 Jun20:41 i`* Re: Positional/physical addressing3Don Y
25 Jun21:35 i `* Re: Positional/physical addressing2Dennis
25 Jun22:53 i  `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1Don Y
25 Jun19:25 `- Re: Positional/physical addressing1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal