Liste des Groupes | Revenir à lang |
Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:25:52 -0700: Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>Also "de helft van een tweeling" (;
scribeva:
On Friday or thereabouts, wugi asked ...Eén van een tweeling, one of the twins.Op 4/07/2024 om 19:09 schreef Athel Cornish-Bowden:>On 2024-07-04 17:03:35 +0000, wugi said:>
>Op 1/07/2024 om 7:56 schreef Hibou:>Le 01/07/2024 à 04:44, HenHanna a écrit :>>>
A pair of pants, or A pair of trousers
>
... ok because each Pair kinda looks like [2 pipes].
>
...but...
"a Pair of Panties" ?????
There appears to be a class of things that exist only in the plural - a
pair of tweezers, scissors, pliers, sunglasses... trousers, underpants,
knickers, tights... - things that bifurcate or are made up of two bits. I
suppose the briefer garments inherited the plural from longer ones
(though a few minutes' searching yields no support for this; briefs were
apparently in use in Ancient Egypt).
[...]
>
Why does English name all these things as pairs, being a single object?
Others like French have a few (lunettes, ciseaux).
But pantalon is singular, though the English word derived from it,
pantaloons,is plural.
Not an explanation, but it seems like a demonstration of how English likes to
see things in "double" ;-)
>>Others like Dutch have none of it in plural or "dual".
Even twins are just one "tweeling".
What is term for each individual twin?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.