Re: Perfect clocks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Perfect clocks
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 29. Apr 2024, 20:42:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17cad465c14cd941$213827$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 29.04.2024 o 19:41, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 29.04.2024 o 14:27, gharnagel pisze:
>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 28.04.2024 o 11:40, Mikko pisze:
>
On 2024-04-27 19:50:34 +0000, gharnagel said:
>
Perhaps there is only one nature, but it has many parts.
The discussion seems to be about the part of nature called
"time" ...
>
Time is not a part of nature. If you remove time and everthing
that is in a time or is a part of time or is a property of time
or requires time to exist then nothing is left.
>
but what is "time"?
>
Many things are called "time".
>
Does every of them have the property above,
poor halfbrain?
That should be "Do all of them," quarterbrain.
>
And that's because...?
 "Does every of them have" is incorrect English, eighthbrain.
Not impossible, but I would rather think you've
fabricated such a rule because it was comfortable
for you at the moment.

 
Time is a tool for describing things.
So Wozzie believes time is a tool, invented, not a concept.
Of course it's a concept. Concepts are invented.
 SO Wozzie starts with the the half-answers and deception again.
Concepts are only "half invented,"
Nope. Concepts are information, I'm an information
engineer, you're just arrogant idiot suffering
the  DK effect. Concepts are definitely invented.

His
problem is that he just proved that what Mikko said is correct.
 
Which one? He said 2 things, generally
excluding each other, as expected from
a relativistic idiot.
 If you can't figure it out, you prove yourself the idiot.
 
Wozzie is dishonest because he takes only a part of the answer
and pretends that it's ALL of the answer.
 
Harrie, on the other hand, is dishonest because
he lies impudently.
 Nope.  I don't lie.
Yes. You do. Typical, of course, for a Shit's
worshipper.

 
- you and your fellow idiot Mikko
believe that,
 :-))
 
because - with all of  your mystical
nonsensens - you're still defining time as "what
clocks indicate". Or don't you?
 I'm not.  I don't think Mikko is, either.
Oops. That's how your idiot guru defined time. This
is the official definition of the church of The Shit.
So - talking about time you're ignoring it - what
are you talking about, then?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal