Re: Space and spacetime

W dniu 20.06.2024 o 14:26, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.06.2024 o 00:09, gharnagel pisze:

>
Wozzie posts nothing but repetitions and lies.
He claims to be an information whatsit, claims science is
information, then denies a major part of science.

See, trash - I've proven the idiocies
of your insane guru to be not even consistent,

 Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Wozzie has.  Why
doesn't he post his "proof" of give a link to it?

Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has.
Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post
it many times more, be sure, trash.

 

and you can do nothing about it apart of
barking, lying and slandering.

 Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-)
 

But you'll do what you can for your moronic church -
that's what it trains its doggies for, after all.

 I can actually "prove" that the LT is correct in its domain
of applicability based on actual [gasp!] information.

I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they
are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to
manage such a task.
Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations,
anyway.

 

And - neither your absurd Shit nor even
whole of your moronic physics is a "major
part of science".
Sorry, trash.

 And all Wozzie has is profanity, lying and slander.  And
inconsistency:  He says physics is information

I do. Even such a piece of lying shit as you
are can't lie always, of course.
I do and it is. Samely as whole science is.
And thus, none of your noble specializations could
mark you as an  invincible expert about it.
You've just self-appointed yourself for that,
as expected from a DK idiot.
and then

denies the information of physics.

Of course. What is inconsistent in denying
some information concocted by some religious
maniacs?