Re: Space and spacetime

W dniu 22.06.2024 o 03:50, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 21.06.2024 o 23:46, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 21.06.2024 o 20:21, gharnagel pisze:

>
An autistic "information engineer" who can't understand
metaphor gets really asinine when his fuzzy-thinking is

A fanatic piece of lying ship, caught on an

impudent, obvious  lie is screaming about a
"metaphor".
So Mad Maciej doesn't understand metaphor.

Why won't you explain, you lying shit.
And why won't you stop dodging and
demonstrate the power of predictions
of your moronic Shit on my example.

 I'm not dodging.  I'm merely asking consequential question which
Woozie-liar refuses to answer.

Yes, you are. You're pretending even stupider
than you are to dodge.

But what does the relativistic piece of
shit mean by "define"? By "must"? By
"terms"?

 I just want everything clearly and honestly laid out.

You must define "clearly and honestly". And "define".
And "must".

So, according to you and your idiot gurus -
in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not -
would observe light moving at speed c. Right?

 What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie, can't actually
USE
the theory and calculate the answer for yourself?

The matter is that mathematically-incompetent Harrie
can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer
for me.

 

As anyone would know if he weren't mathematically
incompetent."

Because of Wozzie's mathematical incompetence, he can't figure out

that

(1) relativistic velocity addition is DERIVED from the Lorentz
transform equations.

 

It is, sure, after assuming the obviously correct
Holiest Postulate.

 The postulates were determined FIRST

And without them - in LET - your idiocies can't be
derived, neither from LT nor from experiments.
, dishonest Wozzie-fool, and THEN

the
LT equations were derived.

A lie, of course. First - Lorentz invented his
equations for his ether theory,  then - your
idiot guru came with his absurd postulates.

And how about 0 meridian? Is it fundamentally
detectable?

 More attempted deflection.  The eath has nothing to do with either LET
or SR.

More dodging.

 

If it is not - it must be nonexistent for all practical purposes.
Am I correct,  Harrie, poor halfbrain?

 It is part of a coordinate system.  Coordinate systems aren't part of
nature.
They are human mental constructs.

Unlike the Holy Postulates,  told your
idiot gurus by Nature itself when She
spoke to them. Right, Harrie?

 But this is another stupid attempt to deflect from Wozzie-filth having
to face
the drubbing he's getting.  His parents didn't do their job of raising
an
honest and responsible human, so he has to take his whuppin' now.