Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity?

On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 3:53:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

You are incapable of comprehension, Penisnino.

>
You said your device has 1000 times better efficiency while I pointed
out that exiting devices have about 50% efficiency,

Idiot you have no clue about engineering. There are many parameters
related to efficiency not just making up figures on the fly as you did.
Arindam's design is certainly 1000 times at least better as it can be
used for making practical reactionless motors for outer space and very
fast near space travel. Infinitely better really for there is no hope
from existing designs for anr reactionless motor mode.
As a gun it will be a infinitely better for with very heavy and slow
armature it can be used for mining and construction by impact drilling.
Not possible with existing designs.
As a weapon it will cause - well Arindam does not want to go into that
unless the Australian Govt wants superior air defence. But given lack of
barrel wear, capability to launch not just heavy bullets but missiles at
supersonic speeds, comparatively low voltages for the high currents, far
greater L factor with new maths, easy scalability - yes it will be at
least 1000 times better from overall performance efficiency as a weapon.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
which means your

device has a 50,000% effiency, which is obviously ridiculous crackpot.

Go away, Penisnino, and chant your simple mantra e=MCC 300000000 times.
All you show is that you are

>
<snip delusional raving unread>