Re: Scalar waves

On 04/27/2024 10:46 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Hi Ng
>
I had read recently something from Tom Bearden.
>
He wrote, that scalar waves are longitudinal waves, which vary in
velocity and are acompanied by a wave, which runs backwards in time.
>
The idea is a little strange and would require to give up the constancy
of the speed of light in vacuum, but to allow a variation of the speed
of light in vacuum.
>
This would cause a wavelike behavior, but longitudinal (opposite to
classical em-waves).
>
This behaviour was called 'polarized in the time-domain'.
>
>
Is this somehow correct?
>
(The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I
had assumed something similar before.)
>
TH
>
>
>

It only goes backward, if at all: zero, so, ....
What that models is that there is a region, all the region
of the affected course of the wave, that is a "locale",
that is a locality, and that according to observer
effect and "real wave collapse", of a superclassical
wave of a locale an extended region, that the "real
wave collapse" is "superclassical flux", i.e. instantaneous.
I.e., the only reason "model of a wave backward in time
as if time was a dimension not a ray", is because,
otherwise it's "model of a wave instantaneous in an
extended region of space". It's only a projection,
because, the real perspective, is a regional perspective,
which is the locale, not just the point perspective.
Waves are considered general models of change in open systems.