Re: Moving a closed system with internal devices...

Le 04/04/2024 à 12:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot post.
 But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.

 And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
educated and sane moderator.

 Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest evils on the planet.

 Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.

 Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.

 Anyone using phrases like "supreme truth" and "priest of that cult" is
obviously a crackpot.

That the cult of relativity, with Einstein as its God-ShowBaby-Wiseguy, is the unquestionable supreme truth for the "physics" world is obvious. Anybody disputing the theology of this cult (basically having as an article of faith a limited, twisted universe where rabid conjectures posing as theories boosted by theabuse of mathematics and the prestige of nukes must mean much more than obvious facts, such as railguns do not have electrical reactions) has to be treated as an outcast.
Labeling is the way out for the e=mcc=hv chanters.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee