Re: Message to Bertie.

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.

>
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.

>
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.

No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.

Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.

Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and
analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep
appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so
great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed,
classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

>

>
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.

>
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
>

>
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.

>
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
>

>
Explain why no one had found any intrinsic fault in Arindam's physics
theories.

>
On the contrary, that has read them has pointed out how rediculous and
laughable they are.
>

>
Explain why they ignore Arindam's discovery that the MMI actually shows
light speed variance this outing the first postulate of sr.

>
Because you have shown nothing of the sort.
>

>
Explain why the bending of starlight in a solar eclipse is not just an
optical effect.

>
This is explained in high school physics.
>

>
Explain why Doppler effect shows light speed variation.

>
Impossible because real experiments don't show that.