Re: Message to Bertie.

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>

So Arindam's model new design Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.

>
The important paramenter of a rifle is muzzle energy

 
 
 
and nobody cares

about momentum as it is the energy that causes the damage and momentum
has little to do with it, creackpot.
>
Further, muzzle energy in a rifle is determined by the ammunition and
not the rifle itslelf, crackpot.
>

However a rifle bullet even with much less momentum can do extreme
damage as great pressures are involved on impact.

>
Imagine a rifle that fires a 100,000 pound projectile at 0.1 feet/sec;
at impact the projectile would mearly push something away doing little
to no damage, crackpot.

 
Stupid Penisnino, matchless idiot that it is, cannot comprehend that
when used as a defence railgun as actual and not as models, Arindam's
new design railgun would fire 1000 kg missile rockets at 500 m/s. They
would then after launch get into rocket mode and reach Mach 15 easily.
That is so far beyond the scope of existing railgun designs which simply
look silly in comparison.

Rocket artillery was invented in the 17th century and you have yet to
launch ANY projectile, crackpot.