Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity?

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

<snip old craP>

Fully agree so all decent scientists must carefully read and see the
physics works of Arindam. Then verify by repeating his rail gun

It seems that you haven't a clue what the word "railgun" means crackpot.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun

"A railgun or rail gun, sometimes referred to as a rail cannon, is a
linear motor device, typically designed as a weapon, that uses
electromagnetic force to launch high-velocity projectiles."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rail%20gun

"an electromagnetic catapult designed to hurl projectiles at
extremely high speeds"

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rail-gun

"a weapon consisting of a pair of parallel conductive rails, using a
magnetic field and electric current to launch projectiles at very
high velocity"

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/railgun

"a gun that uses electromagnetic force to propel a projectile at
very high speeds"

https://www.yourdictionary.com/rail-gun

"A weapon, consisting mainly of conducting metal rails, that uses
electromagnetic force to accelerate a projectile to a much greater
speed than that achieved by conventional chemical propellant weapons."

To be a railgun, the device has to launch a projectile.

All your videos clearly show that your device propels an armature down
a track at low speed where it falls off at the end. That is NOT a railgun
and is nothing more than a linear motor.