Re: ? ? ?

Am 12.03.2024 um 13:01 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

W dniu 12.03.2024 o 09:30, Thomas Heger pisze:

Am 10.03.2024 um 11:35 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
>

>
GPS is pyhsically connected to the Earth, hence 'lives' in the same
'time-domain' (uses Earth time).

>
What is the range of Earth time, then?

>
If timer is local (opposite to 'universal'), than Earth time is valid
on Earth or nearby.

>
So - for every observation made from Earth or nearby?

>
No: time is local everywhere.

>
And an observation made from Earth is made from Earth.
>

What kind of object does use time?

>
I regard matter as 'timelike stable patterns'.

>
I don't give a damn to it. So, what kind of objects
does use time? Does a rock do? What for?
>

>
>
'timelike stable' is a requirement, which all material objects have to
fullfil.

>

Since 'timelike stable' requires time (actually a certain 'axis of time')

>
So, a rock is using time to be "timelike stable".
How does it use it?
And what is this "time" of yours? Are UTC, TAI, a zone
time - times, or are they something else?
>

I regard matter (e.g. particles) as 'timelike stable patterns' (of/in spacetime).
Rock is more a crystal than a particle, what is an ensamble of atoms.
A particle is modelled as 'timelike stable' because this would alllow a certain relatively simple mechanism to explain a variety of different things.
My main aim was to connect GR and QM.
To do so, I had started at the GR side and tried to make particles out of spacetime.
The phenomenon 'time' is then emerging from spacetime, if a certain 'cut' is applied and matter is created, which 'wants' time to exist (to be able to be timelike stable).
So: matter pops out of nowhere and into existence, while the inverse to matter is empty space (vacuum), which is created together with matter and time.
This is a rather strange concept, I have to admit, but seemingly the way how nature functions.
As 'proof of concept' I had 'growing Earth' (which is IMHO correct).
To unbderstand this concept, you could read my 'book', which is about this idea:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing The key point is this:
an object is called a system.
Systems have boarders and borders are assumed to be arbitrary and of equal rights, while some make more sense than others.
This is more or less the opposite to the particle concept of QM, which regards matter (particles) as basic foundation of everything.
TH