Re: Scalar waves

Am Sonntag000028, 28.04.2024 um 18:19 schrieb Ross Finlayson:

On 04/27/2024 10:46 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Hi Ng
>
I had read recently something from Tom Bearden.
>
He wrote, that scalar waves are longitudinal waves, which vary in
velocity and are acompanied by a wave, which runs backwards in time.
>
The idea is a little strange and would require to give up the constancy
of the speed of light in vacuum, but to allow a variation of the speed
of light in vacuum.
>
This would cause a wavelike behavior, but longitudinal (opposite to
classical em-waves).
>
This behaviour was called 'polarized in the time-domain'.
>
>
Is this somehow correct?
>
(The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I
had assumed something similar before.)
>
TH
>
>
>

 It only goes backward, if at all: zero, so, ....
 What that models is that there is a region, all the region
of the affected course of the wave, that is a "locale",
that is a locality, and that according to observer
effect and "real wave collapse", of a superclassical
wave of a locale an extended region, that the "real
wave collapse" is "superclassical flux", i.e. instantaneous.
 I.e., the only reason "model of a wave backward in time
as if time was a dimension not a ray", is because,
otherwise it's "model of a wave instantaneous in an
extended region of space". It's only a projection,
because, the real perspective, is a regional perspective,
which is the locale, not just the point perspective.
 Waves are considered general models of change in open systems.
 

I had written this 'book':
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
There I use  a certain mathematical construct about which I assume, that nature would behave similarly on a very fundamental level.
This contains an expansion and a contraction (wave), which build a standing wave and that 'timelike stable structures', which I assume to be what we call 'matter'.
The concept is therefor called 'structured spacetime'.
The wave and the anti-wave are actually connected, because the world is assumed to be composed from anti-symmetric pointlike elements of spacetime. These are connected with the neighbors, as if these elements would twist each other in a certain mathematical way, as if they were multiplied to the neighbours like quaternions (actually bi-quaternions).
Now it easy to assume, that the negative timeline is regarded as positive for a comoving observer, who in turn would regard our timeline as negative.
That is quite an unusual concept, but would make sense (at least to me).
TH