Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders)

On 11/24/24 04:14, Bertietaylor wrote:

Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible.
 It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative.
 Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown
by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even
more nonsense.
 High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics
that updates Newton and rejects Einstein.

If you reject conservation of energy and conservation of momentum
you are shredding Newton, not updating him.
The relativism you disdain is an irremovable feature of Newton's
physics and of Galileo before him.  In an airplane flying straight
and level in non-turbulent air, a juggler can juggle just as he
would on the ground.  He wouldn't have to adjust his movements in
any way to take account of the fact that the airplane is going
hundreds of miles per hour.  That's an example of relativity.
In 100 years, the names of Einstein, Newton, and Galileo will still
be famous.  In 20 years nobody will remember yours.
--
David Canzi
Manly men, beware!  Beer contains the most potent phytoestrogen.
--
David Canzi
Humanity's survival may depend on answering the
question, "how can we deprogram a country?"