Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal
De : iot (at) *nospam* nii.cn (Tai Loong)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 21. Apr 2024, 17:36:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v03f9h$3aua9$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
Ross Finlayson wrote:

Note this is essentially the first time I agree with Hachel. I doubt
that he understands why what he wrote is actually correct, because he
followed it with a bunch of obfuscatory nonsense.
[... enormous amount of gibberish ignored.] Tom Roberts
 
Can you help further explain for the rest of us why this isn't
necessarily the usual interpretation or why it sort of doesn't arrive at
the same results of some of the usual thought experiments like the
traveling twins?

because the observer is apart from those paths through spacetime. Apart
means distance in time and space. That's what an observer in physics is.
You can make path coincide, but you have to be very careful, you fucking
imbecile.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Apr 24 o Re: [SR] Their proper times will necessarily be equal1Tai Loong

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal