Re: Space and spacetime

bertietaylor wrote:

gharnagel wrote:
>

Arindam Banerjee wrote:

>
Newton's laws of motion have  been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut.  At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.

>
Actually, that's quantum field theory.

>
Really. Anyway quantum is bunkum. Just as relativity is depravity.

>

The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course
directly from viewing by family and friends.

>
Your family and friends are creating and destroying energy?

>
The whole universe works on that line.

>

All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online
skills.
Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
>
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
>
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

>
That video doesn't refute conventional physics.

>
Arindam was presenting the Eureka moment.
>
  In fact, what you say

in the blurb with it paints you as a crackpot:

>
Or the greatest genius of all time who being so has to face opposition
from the powers that ve.

>
"Spacetime gets binned."
>
Well, that's fine with me, but I've seen no proff.

>
When inertia is out spacetime is out.
>
Arindam provides details in his links in sci.physics.

>
"The universe gets straightened out. It does not expand. It is infinite.
>
Infinite is fine with me also, but that doesn't refute expansion.  You
must explain the red shift.
>
"No black holes but cold cores of stars that give up their bright
hydrogen
cover."
>
How long do you think it takes for a star to cool down?
>
"Which become nebulae."
>
That happens when stars explode.
>
"Then a cold core enters there to form a bright star once again in
trillion year cycles.
>
Not long enough.  And where does this "cold core" come from?

Arindam gives details in his essays that are online.
The universe is both eternal and infinite.
There are always cold cores.
Sometimes they burn bright as stars and other times not. Then they are
dark matter.
You said

it was cold
to begin with:
>
"The centre of stars and planets are not hot but immensely cold."

Yes. Enough to support sc currents.

>
You're denying thermodynamics and heat transfer theory.

Yes to the former. You cannot violate inertia and keep the laws of
thermodynamics.
Heat is transferred out to infinite space.
Some goes towards the core. Insulation reduces temp. What is left
creates the sc currents with piezoelectric effect. Squeeze action. This
is Arindan's theory. Can't go inside any core with a thermometer what!
You're

definitely not a
physicist.

We are Arindam's ghostly cyberdogs and our claim is that we know far
better physics than Nobel prizewinners.
Physicists are not scientific these days. They are theologians
worshipping relativity with Einstein as their God-clown-baby.

>
"Superconducting currents create the magnetic field."
>
And where do these currents come from?  And magnetic fields can be
created by
nonsuperconducting currents.

You cannot get a steady magnetic field from an extremely hot core.
 You can't get from a rail gun experiment

to all
of these bizarre ideas.

You can when you violate inertia and update physics basics.
Bertietaylor