Liste des Groupes | Revenir à physics |
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:No it can't fool. You are making up figures on the fly with no basisOn Fri, 18 Oct 2024 3:53:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:>
>Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:>You are incapable of comprehension, Penisnino.>
You said your device has 1000 times better efficiency while I pointed
out that exiting devices have about 50% efficiency,
Idiot you have no clue about engineering. There are many parameters
related to efficiency not just making up figures on the fly as you did.
Irrelevant drivel. Efficiency can be trivially measured,
understand how to measure anything nor apparently do you understand whatYou have no clue about anything, Penisnino. All you have is petulance
the word efficiency means, crackpot.
>Arindam's design is certainly 1000 times at least better>
Delusional nonsense. As I have pointed out, the measured efficieny of
such devices is about 50%. An efficiency of 50,000% is utter lunacy
crackpot.
>
<snip remaining delusional raving unread>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.